Posted by Jonathan A. Barash
In Ramos-Silva v. State Farm Inc. Co., 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 1250 (2009), the Georgia Court of Appeals held that a Uninsured Motorist (“UM”) insurer’s right of subrogation survives the execution of a limited liability release.
Posted by Jonathan A. Barash
In a recent study, the Insurance Research Council (“IRC”) predicted that the recent economic downtown will trigger a sharp rise in the number of uninsured motorists nationwide. In its Uninsured Motorist, 2008 Edition report, IRC predicted a rise from an estimated 13.8% uninsured drivers in 2007 to 16.1% in 2010.
Continue reading "UNINSURED MOTORIST RATES PREDICTED TO INCREASE IN TOUGH ECONOMIC TIMES" »
Posted by H. Lee Pruett
On reconsideration, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed itself in Adams v. State Farm, Case. No. A08A2315 (Ga. Ct. App., April 14, 2009), and ruled that an automobile liability carrier’s payment to satisfy a hospital lien reduces the amount of available coverage so as to increase the amount of uninsured motorist coverage. In its initial decision of February 17, 2009, the Court held that such a payment did not reduce the amount of available liability coverage. (See Levy & Pruett Blog Post dated March 2, 2009.) That initial decision, however, became the minority position of the dissent following the Court’s reconsideration of the case.
Posted by H. Lee Pruett
The Georgia Supreme Court ruled that a limited release for pursuit of uninsured motorist (“UM”) coverage is ambiguous when the plaintiffs -- husband and wife -- settle bodily injury claims and a loss of consortium claim for single person liability limits.
Posted by H. Lee Pruett
The Georgia Court of Appeals recently issued an important decision concerning automobile liability and uninsured motorist coverage. In Adams v. State Farm, Case. No. A08A2315 (Ga. Ct. App., Feb. 17 2009), the plaintiff was seriously injured in a car accident with the defendant who had $25,000 in liability coverage. Nationwide, the defendant’s insurer, paid a portion of the limits to Grady Hospital to satisfy a hospital lien. The balance was paid directly to the plaintiff in exchange for a limited release. The plaintiff then sought uninsured motorist ("UM") coverage from his insurer, State Farm, which provided $100,000 in uninsured motorist coverage. State Farm sought to apply the full amount of the underlying liability coverage as a setoff. The plaintiff argued that State Farm should not be allowed to set off the portion paid to the hospital because payment of the lien reduced the amount of “available” liability coverage.
Posted by H. Lee Pruett
An uninsured motorist carrier may subrogate against an uninsured or underinsured at-fault driver in the event of any payment of uninsured motorist coverage to the plaintiff-insured. In a recent case, McClellan v. Evans, Case No. A08A1277 (Ga. Ct. App., Nov. 17, 2008), the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in prohibiting the plaintiffs’ attorney from cross examining the defendant about an agreement he had reached with the plaintiffs’ uninsured motorist carrier concerning the carrier’s waiver of subrogation against the defendant.
Posted by H. Lee Pruett
Under Georgia law, an insurer must offer uninsured motorist coverage as part of an automobile liability policy. Uninsured motorist coverage provides coverage for the insured’s injuries and/or property damage when an at-fault party has no liability insurance. It may also be used as “underinsured” motorist coverage when the insured’s damages exceed the at-fault party’s liability limits. The insured may reject the coverage in writing.
