Posted On: August 26, 2009

GEORGIA JOINS GROWING “TREND” OF JURISDICTIONS ALLOWING EVIDENCE OF EXPERT'S PERSONAL PRACTICE

Posted by Jonathan A. Barash

You are defending a medical malpractice lawsuit. At trial, plaintiff’s expert testifies that treatment your doctor-client failed to do was required by the applicable standard of care. From pre-trial discovery you know, despite her trial testimony, that plaintiff’s expert did not always employ that particular treatment in her own practice. Until two months ago, you would not be able to offer this evidence to impeach plaintiff’s expert. Evidence of an expert’s own practice was deemed irrelevant on the grounds that the standard of care is that which is employed by the medical profession generally, not what one individual doctor thought was advisable and would have done under the circumstance.

Continue reading " GEORGIA JOINS GROWING “TREND” OF JURISDICTIONS ALLOWING EVIDENCE OF EXPERT'S PERSONAL PRACTICE " »

Posted On: August 5, 2009

JURORS USE OF INTERNET TECHNOLOGY DISRUPTS ORDER IN THE COURT Part 2 of a 2-part Series

Posted by Susan J. Levy

In June, the Indiana Supreme Court decided a civil rape case where a juror received a cell phone call during deliberations. In Henri v. Curto, No. 49S02-0812-CV-641, (Ind. S. Ct., Jun. 17, 2009), the appellant challenged the verdict on the grounds that the juror’s receipt of an incoming cell phone call during jury deliberations pressured the panel to reach a hasty verdict. The Court upheld the verdict, but the Judge wrote:

Continue reading " JURORS USE OF INTERNET TECHNOLOGY DISRUPTS ORDER IN THE COURT Part 2 of a 2-part Series " »