Posted On: January 26, 2009

DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA JUDGE UPHOLDS CONSTITUTIONALITY OF APPORTIONMENT STATUTE: O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33

Posted by Susan J. Levy and H. Lee Pruett

In 2005, the Georgia Legislature passed a number of tort reform measures designed, at least in part, to benefit defendants in civil suits. The Tort Reform Act included an amendment to O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33 which specifically abrogated joint and several liability and mandated that juries now consider the fault of nonparties in assessing the percentages of fault. In a recent case handled by our firm, we used the new statute and timely filed a Notice of Fault of Nonparty identifying the driver of Plaintiff’s vehicle as the at-fault nonparty. In response, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike, arguing (1) that O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33 is unconstitutional and (2) that there can be no apportionment of fault under O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33 unless the plaintiff is to some degree responsible for his damages.

Continue reading " DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA JUDGE UPHOLDS CONSTITUTIONALITY OF APPORTIONMENT STATUTE: O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33 " »

Posted On: January 20, 2009

GEORGIA’S UNINSURED MOTORIST ACT – ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2009 INSURANCE CARRIERS MUST OFFER “ADD-ON” OPTION FOR UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE.

Posted by H. Lee Pruett

Under Georgia law, an insurer must offer uninsured motorist coverage as part of an automobile liability policy. Uninsured motorist coverage provides coverage for the insured’s injuries and/or property damage when an at-fault party has no liability insurance. It may also be used as “underinsured” motorist coverage when the insured’s damages exceed the at-fault party’s liability limits. The insured may reject the coverage in writing.

Continue reading " GEORGIA’S UNINSURED MOTORIST ACT – ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2009 INSURANCE CARRIERS MUST OFFER “ADD-ON” OPTION FOR UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE. " »

Posted On: January 12, 2009

NEW ELEVENTH CIRCUIT CASE BOLSTERS DAUBERT: A POWERFUL TOOL IN ANY GEORGIA INSURANCE DEFENSE ATTORNEY’S TOOLBOX - Part 3 of a 3-Part Series

Posted by Susan J. Levy

In a Daubert motion, the non-moving party has the burden of establishing by a preponderance of proof that a proper foundation exists for the admissibility of that party's proferred expert testimony. Allison v. McGhan Med. Corp., 184 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 1999).

Continue reading " NEW ELEVENTH CIRCUIT CASE BOLSTERS DAUBERT: A POWERFUL TOOL IN ANY GEORGIA INSURANCE DEFENSE ATTORNEY’S TOOLBOX - Part 3 of a 3-Part Series " »

Posted On: January 2, 2009

NEW ELEVENTH CIRCUIT CASE BOLSTERS DAUBERT: A POWERFUL TOOL IN ANY GEORGIA INSURANCE DEFENSE ATTORNEY’S TOOLBOX - Part 2 of a 3-Part Series

Posted by Susan J. Levy

In Wilson v. TASER International, Inc., Appeal No. 08-13810 (11th Cir. 2008), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s Order granting TASER’s Daubert Motion to Exclude the Plaintiff’s expert on the grounds that his opinions were unreliable. The Court’s willingness to scrutinize the qualifications of Plaintiff’s expert and to examine the basis for his opinions, particularly in a case where the expert was not merely promoting junk science, should encourage defense counsel to file Daubert motions whenever the facts allow.

Continue reading " NEW ELEVENTH CIRCUIT CASE BOLSTERS DAUBERT: A POWERFUL TOOL IN ANY GEORGIA INSURANCE DEFENSE ATTORNEY’S TOOLBOX - Part 2 of a 3-Part Series " »