Posted On: November 20, 2008

GEORGIA SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS CGL POLLUTION EXCLUSION IN CARBON MONOXIDE POISONING CASE

Posted by H. Lee Pruett

The Georgia Supreme Court recently considered whether the pollution exclusion in a commercial general liability (CGL) policy applied to a claim of carbon monoxide poisoning. In Reed v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co., Case No. S07G1768 (Ga. S. Ct., Sept. 22, 2008), the plaintiff sued her landlord for negligent maintenance of the plaintiff’s house which allegedly caused carbon monoxide poisoning to the plaintiff. The landlord’s insurer, Auto-Owners, entered a defense under a reservation of rights and filed a declaratory judgment action in which it sought a judgment of no coverage based on the pollution exclusion of the policy. The Superior Court of Butts County denied Auto-Owner’s motion for summary judgment. The Court of Appeals reversed, however, and the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals’ ruling.

Continue reading " GEORGIA SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS CGL POLLUTION EXCLUSION IN CARBON MONOXIDE POISONING CASE " »

Posted On: November 14, 2008

THE IMPACT RULE IN GEORGIA IS LIBERALLY APPLIED TO CLAIMS OF ADULTERATED FOOD

Posted by H. Lee Pruett

Restaurants and other food service providers — and their insurers — need to be aware of Georgia Courts’ liberal application of the “impact rule” in claims of adulterated food.

Generally, before a plaintiff can recover damages for mental pain and suffering, the plaintiff must sustain a physical injury. See, for example, Lee v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co., 272 Ga. 583 (2000). In this case, the Georgia Supreme Court reiterated the three elements of the rule for recovery of a mental injury: there must be (1) a physical impact, (2) causing a physical injury, and (3) mental suffering arising from the physical injury. The Court went on to expand the rule to allow recovery for the mental suffering of a mother who witnessed the suffering and death of her daughter from an automobile accident. The Court emphasized that the mother herself had sustained physical injuries from the same accident.

Continue reading " THE IMPACT RULE IN GEORGIA IS LIBERALLY APPLIED TO CLAIMS OF ADULTERATED FOOD " »